Wow, looks like the NSW conservatives have achieved two excellent outcomes for the state in one. Power privatisation is off (until the Tories do it themselves, that is) and Michael Costa says he's gonna leave politics. That's great news! Seeya Costa. You won't be missed. Reckon you could take the Minister for Ethnic Cleansing, Frank Sartor and your inept boss Iemma with you?
Two interesting nearly-free-software articles about Free Software for Libraries:-
Four more libraries upgrading to free software systems:-
I was just looking to buy some online classes. I haven’t bought one yet and here’s three ideas I think online course sellers should follow to get more customers:-
Are there any good online course providers out there which do all of the above?
Whats the difference between Noise Makers and Audio Filters - well, I would expect a level of control. A Noise Maker implies a lack of control - the difference between “din” and “music”. I’ll start this post off with this image, which is a Waterfall image. Waterfalls are spectrum over time - In this case, the frequency is up the side, and the time is across the bottom. The intensity of the colour indicates a voltage at that particular frequency.
Waterfall of Arduino Noise Maker
What we are seeing is how the frequencies are changing over time when the dials on the board are swizzled, and by comparing this with other audio projects, we are able to see how various features and code changes change the output.
The next stage of the project is Filters - Filters are basically devices which limit frequencies that go through them - there are essentially two types of filters, High pass (which allow high frequencies to go through) and Low Pass (which allow low frequencies through). By combining these together, you can generate Band Pass filters and Notch Filters (although you might make notch filters in a different way).
By adding filters together, you can make filters which let multiple bands (a comb shape) or ban multiple bands. If you have control of your filters, you can change them and manipulate them over time, and apparently, if you generate white noise on one side, and use two bandpass filters, you can make sounds which sound like words - by moving the two filters in and out and widen and narrow.
Anyways, when I was at Uni, I learnt how to build Digital Filters, that is I learnt the electronics behind the DSP, and its quite simple - well, its a little tricky to get them efficient, but a problem that’s been solved time and time again. The system works by multiplying a set of samples in a fashion. Unfortuantly, my choice of modules (50% electronics or low level computing, 25% maths, and about 20% computing theory) means that… I didn’t do the Signals and Systems module because my Maths skills are troubled. I loose the decimal place ok?
So I’ve had a crash course in Fourier Transforms, which are the very basics behind working out the numbers that you need in the sample multipliers… Which is what I’m about to build on this new circuit. So far, I have an analog input (which is my sampling system) and an 6 Bit R2R DAC shield. The first test will be to act as a buffer. The second will to act as an Echo Box, and the third, to Filter.
This and similar posts are just going to be me moaning about a minor tumble I took the other day and are mainly presented only for others to take amusment from.
Day 1On the morning of Tuesday 26th I was crossing the railway level crossing at Feltham when I did what I always reflexively do and looked both ways to see if a train was coming (which I know is a bit silly because the barriers wouldn’t be up if there was, but still). I saw a train in the station and as I was staring at it wondering if it was my train, I tripped up.
I had a bottle of orange juice in one hand and the remote control for my iRiver in the other and before I could decide what I was doing with those, my nose had smacked into the ground with a bit of a crunch. My vision went black for a second and I thought I had broken my nose. Touching it produced a lot of blood (both from the bridge and from the nostrils) but no blinding agony so at least I knew it wasn’t as bad as that. The image to the right is what it looked like by the time I’d got to dayjob and washed up a bit.
I also found out that the expensive sunglasses I bought about 10 days ago have a massive scratch across one lens, and my iRiver remote is even more broken than it was already.
In hindsight it was probably lucky that I was on the level crossing as most of my nose went into the groove of the track. If I hadn’t been and had smacked the flat ground I’m thinking it would be far more likely that it’d have broken my nose.
By Wednesday the throbbing in my nose had mostly gone away, but the bruising really started to show and it began to look a bit uglier. I must have landed on my left little finger as well, as that started to swell up during the night and by the morning was making it difficult to type properly or get the God-forsaken on-call phone out of my pocket.
More to come!
This and similar posts are just going to be me moaning about a minor tumble I took the other day and are mainly presented only for others to take amusment from.
Day 1On the morning of Tuesday 26th I was crossing the railway level crossing at Feltham when I did what I always reflexively do and looked both ways to see if a train was coming (which I know is a bit silly because the barriers wouldn’t be up if there was, but still). I saw a train in the station and as I was staring at it wondering if it was my train, I tripped up.
I had a bottle of orange juice in one hand and the remote control for my iRiver in the other and before I could decide what I was doing with those, my nose had smacked into the ground with a bit of a crunch. My vision went black for a second and I thought I had broken my nose. Touching it produced a lot of blood (both from the bridge and from the nostrils) but no blinding agony so at least I knew it wasn’t as bad as that. The image to the right is what it looked like by the time I’d got to dayjob and washed up a bit.
I also found out that the expensive sunglasses I bought about 10 days ago have a massive scratch across one lens, and my iRiver remote is even more broken than it was already.
In hindsight it was probably lucky that I was on the level crossing as most of my nose went into the groove of the track. If I hadn’t been and had smacked the flat ground I’m thinking it would be far more likely that it’d have broken my nose.
By Wednesday the throbbing in my nose had mostly gone away, but the bruising really started to show and it began to look a bit uglier. I must have landed on my left little finger as well, as that started to swell up during the night and by the morning was making it difficult to type properly or get the God-forsaken on-call phone out of my pocket.
More to come!
In the last year I have bought an Eee PC 900 and a Thinkpad R61 from laptopsdirect.co.uk. The purchase of the Eee PC went smoothly although I did get a call a few weeks later from someone who wanted to sell me an expensive additional warranty.
When I ordered the Thinkpad, I got a call back within a couple of hours saying that they had some “security problems” with my phone number. They claimed that my home phone number did not work. I knew I had input it correctly, and when I asked them to tell me what I had supposedly put in, I got a string of numbers that was too short to be a phone number and which I knew I had never put in myself. I gave them my correct number, and then immediately I was asked a number of sales questions.
They attempted to sell me Microsoft Office (I’m a Linux user), a “pre-delivery dead pixel check” for £39.99 (no thanks), a 3 year warranty for about £80 (I went with manufacturer’s warranty) and laptop insurance (covered by my home insurance). Each time I politely declined, the woman made comments like “oh, you’re just going to risk it then?” By the end of the call I was pretty annoyed and strongly got the impression that the original story about my phone number was a complete fabrication in order to get me on the phone for a hard sell.
Still, the goods were a fair price and arrived on time so apart from making a mental note to be wary of this in future, I forgot about it.
Today I have just received this email:
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:18:20 +0100 From: "Alice@AirConDirect.co.uk" To: “[redacted]@[redacted]” [redacted]@[redacted]> Subject: End of Summer Sale - Further Reductions AND Free Delivery, Ends Sept 1st Reply-To: noreply@aircondirect.co.uk X-Mailer: aspNetEmail ver 3.1.5.0 Hi, Summer’s almost over and we are clearing out all our stocks of air conditioners with a further reductions off sale prices AND FREE DELIVERY to boot. Offer must end 1st September so click on the link below to see what difference the final reductions make to our prices. http://[redacted]/email_shots/summersale.html Alice Taylor AirCon Direct Advisor Tel - 0870 160 3191 www.AirConDirect.co.uk Prices and titles correct at the time of sending e-mail and are subject to availability. You are receiving this email as a previous customer of Laptops Direct / Appliances Direct / Direct TVs / Servers Direct / Acer Direct / AirCon Direct / Shop Targus. You are subscribed to the mailing list with the email address If you have received this in error or would like to unsubcribe please email unsubscribe@aircondirect.co.uk with “unsubscribe” as the subjectAt no point did I give my permission to Laptops Direct to pass my email address around as I have no desire to receive these (completely unrelated) “offers”. I realise that they are owning up to why I am receiving the email and have therefore not done anything illegal, but it is exceptionally rude in my opinion.
This together with the routine with the phone call have ensured that I will never shop from Laptops Direct again, nor any of the other companies listed above. Fortunately I had the presence of mind to use a tagged email address so I can now send mails to that address into oblivion.
I attempted to complain to Laptops Direct about this, but their web site contains no contact email address. They do have a web form. Here’s what happened when I submitted it:
Clownshoes.
In the last year I have bought an Eee PC 900 and a Thinkpad R61 from laptopsdirect.co.uk. The purchase of the Eee PC went smoothly although I did get a call a few weeks later from someone who wanted to sell me an expensive additional warranty.
When I ordered the Thinkpad, I got a call back within a couple of hours saying that they had some “security problems” with my phone number. They claimed that my home phone number did not work. I knew I had input it correctly, and when I asked them to tell me what I had supposedly put in, I got a string of numbers that was too short to be a phone number and which I knew I had never put in myself. I gave them my correct number, and then immediately I was asked a number of sales questions.
They attempted to sell me Microsoft Office (I’m a Linux user), a “pre-delivery dead pixel check” for £39.99 (no thanks), a 3 year warranty for about £80 (I went with manufacturer’s warranty) and laptop insurance (covered by my home insurance). Each time I politely declined, the woman made comments like “oh, you’re just going to risk it then?” By the end of the call I was pretty annoyed and strongly got the impression that the original story about my phone number was a complete fabrication in order to get me on the phone for a hard sell.
Still, the goods were a fair price and arrived on time so apart from making a mental note to be wary of this in future, I forgot about it.
Today I have just received this email:
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:18:20 +0100 From: "Alice@AirConDirect.co.uk" To: “[redacted]@[redacted]” [redacted]@[redacted]> Subject: End of Summer Sale - Further Reductions AND Free Delivery, Ends Sept 1st Reply-To: noreply@aircondirect.co.uk X-Mailer: aspNetEmail ver 3.1.5.0 Hi, Summer’s almost over and we are clearing out all our stocks of air conditioners with a further reductions off sale prices AND FREE DELIVERY to boot. Offer must end 1st September so click on the link below to see what difference the final reductions make to our prices. http://[redacted]/email_shots/summersale.html Alice Taylor AirCon Direct Advisor Tel - 0870 160 3191 www.AirConDirect.co.uk Prices and titles correct at the time of sending e-mail and are subject to availability. You are receiving this email as a previous customer of Laptops Direct / Appliances Direct / Direct TVs / Servers Direct / Acer Direct / AirCon Direct / Shop Targus. You are subscribed to the mailing list with the email address If you have received this in error or would like to unsubcribe please email unsubscribe@aircondirect.co.uk with “unsubscribe” as the subjectAt no point did I give my permission to Laptops Direct to pass my email address around as I have no desire to receive these (completely unrelated) “offers”. I realise that they are owning up to why I am receiving the email and have therefore not done anything illegal, but it is exceptionally rude in my opinion.
This together with the routine with the phone call have ensured that I will never shop from Laptops Direct again, nor any of the other companies listed above. Fortunately I had the presence of mind to use a tagged email address so I can now send mails to that address into oblivion.
I attempted to complain to Laptops Direct about this, but their web site contains no contact email address. They do have a web form. Here’s what happened when I submitted it:
Clownshoes.
This from Joey Stanford..
"The #launchpad team leads just developed a roadmap to open source Launchpad by the next #oscon conference. Really cool stuff!"
No pressure there guys..
I reached a magic number on last.fm today:
Check Wikipedia if you have no idea what I'm talking about.
Blimey. I didn’t realise that Facebook are trending down support for IE6. The “new look” is disabled, and if you use the old look you get a big message complaining about your browser choice:
'You may want to upgrade your browser (from IE6)', says Facebook
Two interesting things here: first, they recommend that you try another browser, and give a list of Firefox, Safari, and Flock as well as “upgrade to Internet Explorer 7″. Flock? I bet the Opera people are a bit hacked off about that.
Second: there have been a few cases so far of people dropping support for IE6 (MobileMe, not that that really counts because all its users are Mac people, and 37 Signals, ditto), but nothing remotely as high-profile as Facebook. This is the boot starting to descend, I think. IE6 is already the bugbear of the industry (and has been for some time: I said “Internet Explorer is the new Netscape 4” in 2005 and I was hardly the first!); how long before we see support for it drop to Netscape 4 levels of “you get the unenhanced non-JavaScript version”?
I’d like to see more people publish browser stats for their websites. Yes, they’re unreliable, yes people change their user agent, blah blah blah. They’ll give us an indication, though; how many people out there are using IE6? Google Analytics tells me that 36% of my visitors are using IE, and 37% of those are using IE6, which means that IE6 visitors to my site are down to under 15%. (If you’re not using Analytics, analog -G -A +a +B <apache logfile> will give you a browser list, as will many other things.) Other people will doubtless differ, and I’d be thoroughly interested in seeing more of these percentages from sites with a different user-base to mine. If you’re a company, tell us what percentage of your users are using IE6! We’re not going to get stats out of Google or Yahoo or the BBC, but non-behemoths will do fine here. Everyone else, start thinking: where’s the cut-off point? How low does IE6’s market share need to go before it’s reasonable to not devote extra development time to it?
“Extra” is the keyword there — people thinking “hey, Opera/Safari/Firefox 3/IE8 has less than 15% market share in my statistics, let’s cut them off, Mr. Microsoft Hater” need to consider that modern browsers don’t (or at least shouldn’t) take any extra development time to work around their idiosyncrasies. (In practice, Safari does require more extra development time than I’d like, I find, but its market share is high enough (or the idiosyncracies are infrequent enough) that supporting it is broadly worth the effort.)
So: if you have IE6 stats, publish them. If you’re a web hacker: when should we cut off the ailing IE6’s life support? Speak now…
Blimey. I didn’t realise that Facebook are trending down support for IE6. The “new look” is disabled, and if you use the old look you get a big message complaining about your browser choice:
'You may want to upgrade your browser (from IE6)', says Facebook
Two interesting things here: first, they recommend that you try another browser, and give a list of Firefox, Safari, and Flock as well as “upgrade to Internet Explorer 7″. Flock? I bet the Opera people are a bit hacked off about that.
Second: there have been a few cases so far of people dropping support for IE6 (MobileMe, not that that really counts because all its users are Mac people, and 37 Signals, ditto), but nothing remotely as high-profile as Facebook. This is the boot starting to descend, I think. IE6 is already the bugbear of the industry (and has been for some time: I said “Internet Explorer is the new Netscape 4” in 2005 and I was hardly the first!); how long before we see support for it drop to Netscape 4 levels of “you get the unenhanced non-JavaScript version”?
I’d like to see more people publish browser stats for their websites. Yes, they’re unreliable, yes people change their user agent, blah blah blah. They’ll give us an indication, though; how many people out there are using IE6? Google Analytics tells me that 36% of my visitors are using IE, and 37% of those are using IE6, which means that IE6 visitors to my site are down to under 15%. (If you’re not using Analytics, analog -G -A +a +B <apache logfile> will give you a browser list, as will many other things.) Other people will doubtless differ, and I’d be thoroughly interested in seeing more of these percentages from sites with a different user-base to mine. If you’re a company, tell us what percentage of your users are using IE6! We’re not going to get stats out of Google or Yahoo or the BBC, but non-behemoths will do fine here. Everyone else, start thinking: where’s the cut-off point? How low does IE6’s market share need to go before it’s reasonable to not devote extra development time to it?
“Extra” is the keyword there — people thinking “hey, Opera/Safari/Firefox 3/IE8 has less than 15% market share in my statistics, let’s cut them off, Mr. Microsoft Hater” need to consider that modern browsers don’t (or at least shouldn’t) take any extra development time to work around their idiosyncrasies. (In practice, Safari does require more extra development time than I’d like, I find, but its market share is high enough (or the idiosyncracies are infrequent enough) that supporting it is broadly worth the effort.)
So: if you have IE6 stats, publish them. If you’re a web hacker: when should we cut off the ailing IE6’s life support? Speak now…
I've updated my simple Simple SDL based perl game, so that:
I still need to work on the rebound-angle but otherwise it is as complete as it will probably ever become. It would also be nice if the balls could collide with each other, and be different colours..
Regardless it was a fun diversion for a few hours, and probably tells me that I shouldn't attempt to waste more time doing gamy things, and that maths is too hard for me these days.
ObQuote: Interview with the vampire
419 Eater always amuses me - it is a website scam-baiters follow through with those Nigerian scam emails. Today though I read a case where someone manages to persuade the scammer to tattoo Baited By Shiver on his leg.
Comedy.
419 Eater always amuses me - it is a website scam-baiters follow through with those Nigerian scam emails. Today though I read a case where someone manages to persuade the scammer to tattoo Baited By Shiver on his leg.
Comedy.